I would be interested in Saagar's theory of change.
He's comparing BLM protesters to German Anarchists, or like pogroms or something. And I don't know enough about the history to say confidently, but that seems like quite an overstep.
We're talking about isolated but significant destruction of property. We're not talking about widespread directed killings and assassinations. And Saagar has been around Krystal and Ryan enough to know that there is no real coordination or cohesion in the Left that even could do that, let alone one that would.
And frankly, Mamdani is pretty much my last hope for change within the political system. If he gets coopted or blocked from implementing his goals...
So we shouldn't be harassing parishioners during a service. I agree with Krystal, that it's a optics own-goal, but that it's laudable that people are acting to stand up against a tyrannical government (and go farther and laude the J6rs, at least the ones who were misled and not the cynical instigators and feds, for the same.)
What are some principles we ought to be keeping in mind that bottom up protestors have used historically to make effective political movements, and how did violence, destruction, and disruption relate?
(reuploaded for Spotify and Apple podcasts)
These segments were scheduled a few days ago but were postponed due to Trump's actions in Venezuela. Enjoy some late extra content starting with Emily going deep on Ryan's socialist past, career in journalism, and the infamous time he got in a fist fight with Jesse Watters.
Welcome to your Breaking Points Premium subscription!
With your support you'll get access to our AMAs, full ad free shows in your inbox every morning, the premium exclusive second half of every Friday show, and more!
Here are some helpful resources to get you started with your subscription:
Connect BP to your Podcast Player: https://support.locals.com/en/article/what-is-rss-and-how-do-i-use-it-ekrqi/
Connect BP to your Spotify: https://support.locals.com/en/article/connecting-to-spotify-dtbjpj/?bust=1745352886430
Account/Billing/Tech Support: http://breakingpoints.locals.com/contact
We're so grateful for your support and trust as you join us on our journey to create better independent media.
- BP Team
Thank you for becoming a member at Breaking Points, now on Locals!
You will get access to all the exclusive content, our full length shows, and new Q&A live streams that will be on Locals. Locals adds great features to the show such as the mobile app, higher quality video, and screen casting to your TV!
If you need any help, please contact [email protected].
Thanks for being a part of the next step in our independent media journey,
BP Team
Ryan and Emily interview Christian Parenti on Trump, Venezuela and his life story!
YouTube: https://youtu.be/td2tvKEpe3o
Krystal, Ryan and Emily discuss China calling Trump's bluff on tariffs, stock market reacts, and a lawyer for a wrongly deported man responds to JD Vance.
YouTube: https://youtu.be/5aaiNVuR134
Spotify Link: https://open.spotify.com/show/2togMvVQ0F4mXQmbwuFs4K?si=wEARUQEoSR2o4KFxn-wR4w
Timestamps:
(00:00)Introduction and Overview of Liberation Day
(2:25)Jobs Report Analysis and Economic Implications
(14:58)The Impact of Tariffs on Domestic Economy
(26:15)Trump's Economic Strategy and Its Consequences
(40:55)The Autocratic Leadership Style of Trump
(42:19)The Case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia
(1:12:02)The Shift in Democratic Leadership Dynamics
(1:17:53)Upcoming Nationwide Protests Against Trump
(1:33:45)End Of Show
If you need any help, please contact http://breakingpoints.locals.com/contact
To connect your RSS feed, use this link: https://breakingpoints.locals.com/rss
Can someone PLEASE remind Saagar that BLM protests were 6 years ago and ask him to stop using them as justification for literally ANYTHING he sees as a liberal protest cause? It just always comes off like he’s pushing regime propaganda. Find some other way to try to support your points. Jfc.
Can someone who shares Saagars general worldview explain his position on the church/ICE situation? I genuinely don’t understand what he’s saying. It seems like he was saying “Churches have no rights to protect them and their congregations from government force because I have seen that undocumented criminals have lived in some. But also the federal/state/city government has an imperative to prosecute and jail protestors (mob, gathering whatever you want to call it) because I hate BLM Twitter liberals”
I mean is that really the core argument? It seems like that’s what he always falls back on. “This is justified because 2020 BLM was insane.” I think a lot of it is cringe and destructive as well but…
Idk someone help me out here. Am I misunderstanding or is that actually what it is?
